Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No one shall borrow or lend a means of access or keep, deliver or distribute a means of access while demanding, demanding or promising compensation in using or managing the means of access.
Nevertheless, at around November 20, 2018, the Defendant agreed to lend a check to an unqualified person and receive money to the account to use for collecting money supplied to an unauthorized alcoholic beverage business entity. On November 20, 2018, the Defendant, at the C office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, a copy of the check card connected to the D bank account (E) under the name of the Defendant.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement concerning F;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the attachment of replies after the execution of a warrant of seizure, confirmation of the point of withdrawal, and submission of advertising text messages);
1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the lending of the means of electronic financial transactions with the promise of consideration for sentencing is that it would undermine the stability and reliability of electronic financial transactions, and it is necessary to strictly punish the means of access that may be abused for other crimes, such as singinginging, fraud, etc. In reality, the fact that the victim of the fraudulent crime has occurred through the means of access leased by the defendant, and that the possibility that the means of access could be used for illegal purposes could have been predicted in light of the contents proposed by the person who has not received the name may be used for the illegal purpose is unfavorable to the defendant. The fact that the defendant recognized
The records of this case as well as the above circumstances.