A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in flowers delivery business.

On June 26, 2018, the Defendant, along with the victim D (Woo, 50 years of age) who had a relationship with 12:00 Sincheon-si C and 201 Sincheon-si, 201, took an attitude from the victim of his residence to “I am late back to the new wall. I am at home. I am to do so at home.” The Defendant took a view of the victim’s gate, which is a dangerous object in the main room, with the victim’s view to drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking, and drinking, drinking, etc.

As a result, the defendant carried a shelter, which is a dangerous object, and expressed the attitude of posing any danger and injury to the body of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a intimidation case;

1. Photographs photographs, such as damage situations, etc.;

1. The victim testified to the effect that the investigation report (to hear the victim's statement) (the investigative agency made a statement to the effect that "the defendant saw the defendant to be used for the main purpose and to be "the fluor" and "the fluor," and the part part of the fluort, once, and the fluort, once, and the part of the fluort was threatened with the part of the fluort, once, once, and the part of the fluort, once," and that "the defendant puts the fluort with the above fluort, and fluort with the above fluort of the fluort," and that "the defendant made a false statement at the trial that the defendant want to get

In doing so, the following circumstances, i.e., ① the victim reported 112 immediately after the crime of this case, and again presented the situation of damage against the investigator in charge who was dispatched to the site after receiving the 112 report. It is deemed that the victim did not have sufficient time to make a false statement in the situation of the crime of this case and did not make a false statement.