logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.17 2013가합28303
보험금 지급
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On June 22, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant with the following contents in order to secure property damage caused by fire, collapse, etc. on the steel framed 420 square meters in the area where the wife population is moving, the steel framed 420 square meters in the area where the Defendant used to move, the steel framed 493.50 square meters in the single-story roof, the steel framed pent 493.50 square meters in the single-story ridge 493.50 square meters in the steel framed Gagllll, the steel framed Gagll Gagll Gagll Ma, the steel framed Gagll Gag Gag Gag Gag Gag Gag Gag Gag Ga

(hereinafter “this case’s insurance contract”). A policyholder and the insured: The insurance period from June 22, 2010 to June 22, 2015: The amount of insurance coverage (the content of security and the maximum amount of compensation): 570,000 won in buildings, 920,000, 920,000 won in fixtures, 10,000,000 won in household fixtures and fixtures, and the cause of a fire that could not be known at the Plaintiff’s factory building within the Plaintiff’s workplace was assessed as follows on April 18, 2012 (hereinafter “instant accident”), and Seoul Adjustment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul Adjustment”) assessed the Plaintiff’s amount of damages and the insurance amount that the Defendant should pay as follows:

The insurable value of non-fixed building 1,010,151,204 150,754,042 106,332,842,228,406 pro rata Indemnity Machinery 724,228,406 462,742,791,792,796,0406,427,427,0314,840,786,0314,786, pro rata Indemnity Co., Ltd. 573,916,425 (unit : won) [based on recognition]. The judgment on the main purport of this paragraph is that the Plaintiff paid damages to the Plaintiff’s part of the insurable value of the machinery due to the Plaintiff’s accident in the instant place of business, asserting that the Plaintiff had suffered damages to the Plaintiff’s part of the insurable value of the machinery in the instant place of business, and that the Plaintiff had been paid damages to the Plaintiff as the insurable value of the machinery.

arrow