beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months at the Busan District Court on August 30, 201 with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on December 21, 2014. On April 1, 2004, Ulsan District Court sent juvenile protection case to the Busan District Court as a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On May 2, 2006, the Busan District Court was sentenced to imprisonment for a maximum term of ten months and a short term of eight months with prison labor for larceny at the Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch, and was sentenced to imprisonment for a short term of one year and six years with prison labor for a short term of one year and one year for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Ulsan District Court on August 9, 207, and was sentenced to a fine of three years from the Busan District Court on October 29, 2009 to a fine of three hundred one year and six years from the Busan District Court.
"2015 Highest 2498"
1. C and the Defendant’s joint crime (Habitual theft) committed against the Defendant, from around August 2015 to around a certain place of residence, were staying in the Eelel located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, without having her friendship C, and around August 2015, in mind that, around the end of August 2015, the amount of money for termination of the shortage of living expenses would be stolen by entering the room, and one person, who, while entering the room, had shown that the gold puts into the room, had the gold puts into the room, and had the gold puts into the room, he saw that the gold would go back to the room, and he would go together at a specific place.
A. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant, along with C, went in front of the bank run by the victim G in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. on September 3, 2015, and C remains in the vehicle outside of the bank, and the Defendant saw the gold bank as if the gold bank was purchased by entering the bank, and the Defendant saw the gold bank as if the gold bank was purchased. The Defendant saw the victim as it shows one gold bag equivalent to 1750,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.