A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 16, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol) driven a D low-speed car with alcohol content of about 0.208% in the section of about 10 meters from the day front of the C cafeteria located in B in the next Busan Metropolitan City around 20:35 on the same day from October 16, 2015 to the canal road.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with D low speed.

On October 16, 2015, at around 20:35, the Defendant driven the said car in a state of difficulty in driving normally due to the influence of alcohol, and led to the driving of the said car in front of the C cafeteria located in the next City City B from the park to the front of the C cafeteria.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was parked adjacent to the road where he was under the influence of alcohol due to the negligence of wrong operation of the steering and steering gear.

E The front part of the cargo vehicle is shocked with the front part of the Defendant vehicle and continued to have been parked on the right side after moving the vehicle.

F The left-hand side and back-hand side of the vehicle of the F, and the left-hand side of the vehicle of the C cafeteria, which was parked on the right-hand side before the left-hand side by shocking the glass wall of the vehicle of the Defendant’s vehicle into the rear part of the vehicle, and driving on the right-hand side.

G The left-hand side of the vehicle was shocked by the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the front part of the vehicle first collisioned during the re-driving of the vehicle was re-shamped with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence provides approximately two weeks’ medical treatment to the victim H (36 tax) who was in a C cafeteria.