logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.09 2015가단45167
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Appointed)'s claim against the defendants is dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

Reasons

1. On June 22, 2012, Plaintiff A visited Plaintiff D, who was a mother of brain disease disorder, on his/her own vehicle, to an E agency, and returned to the work, there was Defendant B and Si expenses who were in charge of an inquiry by the E agency due to the stop problem.

Plaintiff

A made an objection against Defendant B’s attitude of responding to Defendant B’s civil petitioner, and Defendant B, rather, made three times or three times or more of the Plaintiff A’s chest, and “humd” made a common verbal abuse.

Plaintiff

A tried to request correction to Defendant B, who is the commercial of Defendant B, but intended to put Defendant B into the place of the Defendant B.

As a result, Defendant B plucked and plucked Plaintiff A’s arms with a hand, with a plucked and plucked, and plucked Plaintiff A’s arms with a hand, without a plucking to Plaintiff A’s secret name.

As a result, the plaintiff A suffered from the bodily injury of the part on left hand.

Therefore, Defendant B and C are liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs as tort, and Defendant Korea is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs pursuant to Article 2 of the State Compensation Act. Thus, Defendant B and C are liable to pay 20,000,000 won and damages for delay.

2. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs, such as the statement of No. 7 and the video of No. 8, etc., are insufficient to recognize that Defendant B made verbal abuse to, and used assault to, the Plaintiff as claimed by, the Plaintiffs, and there is no other evidence to prove that Defendant B committed any illegal act against, the Plaintiffs in relation to the performance of duties. Thus, the Plaintiffs’ assertion is without merit without need to further examine.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are without merit, and each of them is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow