1. The Defendant’s executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Seoul Eastern District Court 201j.3910 against Nonparty C.

1. The Defendant applied for the execution of seizure of the corporeal movables C in this Court D on the basis of the executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Seoul Eastern District Court 201j3910 against Nonparty C. On July 9, 2020, the enforcement officer of this Court delegated the execution (hereinafter “instant seizure execution”) who attached each of the items listed in the separate sheet as of July 9, 2020 (hereinafter “instant seizure execution”), and each of the items listed in the separate sheet as of the Plaintiff’s ownership, may be acknowledged as being without dispute between the parties, or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to each of the items listed in subparagraphs A through 14 (including the serial number).

According to the above facts, the execution of the seizure of this case is illegal and thus shall be dismissed.

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.