logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.22 2015고단5617
위증
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. While working for F Co., Ltd. (F) on July 2010, the Defendant received 5 billion won investment from G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as G) to the Fund “H” (hereinafter referred to as the “Fund”), from around July 2010, and was in charge of its operation.

However, on February 201, the Fund was liquidateded with approximately KRW 4,450,000,000,000, and approximately KRW 550,000,000 out of the investment amount was recovered.

I, the president of G, was the representative director of G on April 2012 on the ground that he neglected to perform his duties as the representative director while making investment in this case on or around April 2012.

J against the Seoul Central District Court 2012 filed a lawsuit claiming compensation for damages amounting to KRW 3.945 billion by 34363,000.

B. On November 1, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness of Defendant J at the court of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court No. 561 located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and gave a letter on the following perjury.

① At first, G testified that this degree of money was to be paid as tuition fees because of the fact that stories, at all times, have been set up in the holding space as well as at the time of numerous hostings, G had been able to pay the amount of money as tuition fees, and G had expressed that the amount of money of KRW 80 billion to KRW 100 million was invested in other stocks or overseas and that this degree of money was not money.

However, no one among G employees has made the above remarks to the defendant.

2. [The Fund was first created at the beginning and had not been seen at all about the female provisions of G until a certain period of time elapsed, and the K director and L vice-director, who are G employees, have no inside rules of “orly there is any inside rules of law.”

. “At the same time, ? there is any sel on the screen, with respect to the goods that are mechanically in the market on the screen, but this is a kind of special product, so this may be applied to this good.

arrow