1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court’s reasoning is that, except for the following “the second instance portion”, the reasoning for this case is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, and thus, the same is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of

2. The dismissal of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows from the 2nd to the 3nd 14th .

A. B was converted from the Defendant on May 30, 206 to the registration conversion as of January 31, 2012 of E, F, G, and H respective land, and became the land of E, I, J, and K in Sung-si. As of February 9, 2012, the land was combined into the land of C forest 6,463 square meters as of February 9, 2012. As of May 7, 2012, 2,2,201 square meters out of the above land was divided into L, and the land category was changed to the land category on May 18, 2012.

(1) Of the instant land (hereinafter “each of the instant land”), the permission for conversion of the use of Class II neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “permission for conversion”) was obtained with respect to the area of 4,262 square meters among the instant land, and the permission for conversion of the use of Class II neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “permission for conversion of the use”) was obtained on August 16, 2006 with respect to the area of 1,987 square meters.

① Since then, on March 31, 2008 regarding permission for conversion of mountainous district, the name of the person who obtained permission was changed in order on July 9, 2008.

B. As to each of the lands of this case, the plaintiff is "voluntary auction procedure of Suwon District Court DD" (hereinafter referred to as "voluntary auction of this case").

From April 29, 2010, upon receipt of the decision to permit sale as of May 25, 2010, the sales price of KRW 1,100,000 was paid in full as of May 25, 201, and on the same day, the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Plaintiff was completed due to the voluntary auction in this case, and on the same day, the name of the Defendant was changed from July 22, 2010 to the Plaintiff.