1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. E was indicted for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Punishment, etc. of Bribery, and was sentenced to a penalty of KRW 39,320,000 in imprisonment on January 20, 2012, and was sentenced to a penalty of KRW 7 years and KRW 39,320,000. The said judgment became final and conclusive on July 5, 2012 in Seoul High Court Decision 2012No399,320,000.

B. The only real estate in the name of E as of the date of the closing of the argument in the instant case is Jindo City F No. 310, 901 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

C. On June 8, 1993, the ownership transfer registration under the name of the Defendant C was completed for the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “real estate of this case”), and on December 3, 2008, the ownership transfer registration was completed under the name of the Defendant B for the reason of sale on or around December 3, 2008. Accordingly, on October 11, 2010 and December 20, 2012, the ownership transfer registration was completed under the name of G and the Defendant A (E spouse).

Attached Form

On November 14, 2001 with respect to the real estate listed in the list 2 (hereinafter “instant two real estate”), the ownership transfer registration under Defendant D was completed on August 28, 2009, and the ownership transfer registration was completed in Defendant B’s name on the ground of sale on August 28, 2009.

E. The above C.

subsections and d.

The registration of ownership transfer under the name of each of the Defendant B (hereinafter “each of the instant registrations”) is a registration made pursuant to the title trust agreement between E and the Defendant B.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 6 evidence (including branch numbers in case of additional number) and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The registration of each transfer of ownership of the Plaintiff’s assertion was completed in the middle omitted type title trust agreement between E and Defendant B, and each title trust agreement and any change in real rights pursuant thereto are both null and void.

Therefore, it is true.