A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:50 on November 8, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven a B SP car and driven the front road in front of the Ycheon-si, with the intention of having the police officers belonging to the Gyeonggi-do Police Station reported the crackdown on the driving of drinking in front of the Ycheon-si; and (b) had them known to the police as a separate fraud case; and (c) continued to stop the above control by disregarding the situation D, etc. belonging to the above police station, while disregarding the demand for the suspension of the above police station’s situation D, etc.; (d) the above police station slope E, which belongs to the above police station, driven the said car in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the said vehicle in front of the said vehicle in front of the Ycheon-si; and (c) had the said vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the said vehicle in front of it.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on traffic control.

2. The Defendant damaged the goods for special use by driving a car, such as the date and time, place specified in paragraph 1, and as stated in paragraph 1, damaged the repair cost by 12,300 won by putting one light light light light, as specified in paragraph 1, which is used by the Leecheon Police Station for traffic control, into the above car, which is used by the said police station for the traffic control. The safety height used by the same police station, which was continuously on the floor, on the floor, continuously put the safety height of the same police station on the floor into the above car and making it an opposite line.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous articles, damaged articles used by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each written estimate of the police statement written by the defendant in his/her legal statement (the second public trial date) E;

1. Article 144(1), Article 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act for the crime concerned, Article 144(1), Article 144(1), and Article 141(1) (a) of the Criminal Act for the crime (a point of impeding the performance of special duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the ordinary concurrent crimes: Determination of imprisonment with prison labor for the choice of punishment