logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.10.12 2016고단4189
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From June 21, 2016, the Defendant, from around June 21, 2016, received real-time instructions from the staff of the Bosing Operation (i.e., Scarp or Logs) to carry out the transportation of the Bosing Operation, which directly takes charge of the money which the nominal owner of the Bosing Account withdraws withdrawss from the account designated by the Bosing Operation Committee, and transfers to the account designated by the Bosing Operation Committee, after receiving the money which the nominal owner of the Bosing Account withdraws withdraws, and received an amount equivalent to 1% of the remittance amount per case, and conspired to commit the Bosing Operation, such as receiving KRW 90,00 or KRW 20,000 per day, on the day on which the remittance cannot be carried out.

1. According to the above conspiracys as to the crime committed against the victim D, the Defendant: (a) called the victim D (or the age of 44) by phone call at a non-displace on July 14, 2016; (b) misrepresentation of the professional counselor of the credit lending company of the KBB National Bank; and (c) “In order to raise the credit limit of the marina Loan, the Defendant borrowed KRW 3 million from love and repaid it to his account he designates after 20 and 3 days.”

However, in fact, the person under whose name is not the professional counselor of the KBB National Bank Credit Loans Trust Corporation, there was no intention or ability to raise the credit limit of the victim, and it was thought that he was used in the Bophishing organization by receiving money from the victim.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the employee in the name-disscam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam to the victim’s account in the name of E around 10:15 on July 19, 2016, and the defendant attempted to receive the above money from E, the nominal owner of the head of the Tong, but the defendant failed to receive it from E, thereby resulting in an attempted crime.

Accordingly, the defendant's nameless scaming staff, etc.

arrow