1. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition of granting medical care approval to the Intervenor joining the Defendant is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 14, 2015, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) filed a petition with the Defendant for the medical care benefits for the instant injury to the Defendant, where the Defendant was diagnosed as “defensive, artificial pulmonary brain damage” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury”) as a result of cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a result of cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to the outbreak of heart suspension after arrival at the said hospital, and the Defendant was transferred to the hospital, and was diagnosed as “defensive, artificial pulmonary brain damage” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury”), and filed a petition with the Defendant for medical care benefits for the instant injury.

B. However, on October 25, 2016, the Defendant original disposition agency decided not to pay medical care benefits for the instant injury and disease to the intervenors according to the result of the deliberation by the Seoul Special Disease Determination Committee, that there is no proximate causal relation between the Intervenor’s work and the injury and disease of this case.

C. On March 9, 2017, the Intervenor filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee. On the part of the Intervenor’s objection to the said decision, the said Committee revoked the Defendant’s original disposition’s determination on the payment of the medical care benefit site for the Intervenor on October 25, 2016, on the ground that it is determined that the Plaintiff’s work and the instant injury were the injury and injury caused by the pulmonary work, given that it is sufficient for the Intervenor to inhale the hazardous gas generated in the course of washing and cutting the waste test risks where a hazardous chemical substance remains.

After that, on March 27, 2017, the Defendant original disposition agency decided to pay medical care benefits for the injury and disease of the instant case to the intervenors (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2-2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and arguments.