logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.26 2013고정1292
업무방해
Text

Punishments against the Defendants shall be prescribed by each fine of KRW 2,00,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairman of the G Propup Council (hereinafter referred to as the “sub-council”) composed of the owners of the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Commercial Building (hereinafter referred to as the “Commercial Building”), Defendant B is the subject of the prop-council, and Defendant C is the chief of the electricity office who manages the electricity of the commercial building.

From 1980 to 1980 to manage commercial buildings under the implied agreement with each commercial building operation committee, and there is no provision or agreement on the management expenses (electric room management expenses and agency room management expenses) that can be collected from each commercial building operation committee, and there is no provision or agreement between the props association and the store operator or the commercial building operation committee on matters related to the overdue management expenses, which can be paid by the props association to the store operator or the store operation committee.

On July 2008, the "H shopping mall operation council (the president: I; hereinafter the "the fireworks shopping mall operation council") comprised of 51 fireworks stores in the third floor of commercial buildings" has been requesting the Propup from July 2008 to disclose the details of the use of management expenses, paying only the management expenses for the electric room, such as electricity, water and gas charges, and not paying the management expenses for the institution room such as personnel expenses for the institution room and the institution room.

Accordingly, on February 23, 2012, the board of directors of the Prop to resolve with strong will in the absence of management expenses, and did not make a resolution to withdraw the short-term measures at the unpaid shop of management expenses.

Nevertheless,

1. The Defendants, from around 03:00 on April 2, 2012 to 04:40 on the same day, failed to comply with the demand of the Defendant for the supply of electricity on the third floor fireworks, including JA operated by the victim I, on the ground that part of the management expenses is not paid from the commercial building located in F in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jung-gu.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the situation of the victims by force.

2. The Defendants from around 03:00 on May 11, 201 to October 14 of the same month.

arrow