logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.01.18 2017고합340
특수강도미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

excessive one (Evidence No. 1), coloring co-ray 1,00,000 square meters (Evidence No. 2), which was seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 00:30 on November 18, 2017, carried the convenience store of “△△△△△△△△△△” located in Ansan-si, a member of the Gu of the Gu of Ansan-si, carried with a test color string, put a deadly weapon, which is a deadly weapon (the total length: 23 cm, a knife length: 11 cm) prepared in advance on the knife at the knife, and then put the victim convenience store D into “the money, the money, the money, the money, the money, the money, the money, the money, and the money, the money shall be deducted.

“If the knife the knife is unable to resist against the victim, the victim made a payment of cash within the period of cash withdrawal in which the knife had the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 342, 334 (2), 334 (1), and 333 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of attempted punishment: Articles 25(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under Acts: Imprisonment for one year and three months to seven years; and

2. Sentencing is not applicable because the sentencing sentencing is not determined.

Although the Defendant voluntarily withdraws money by threatening the employees of the convenience store, the crime of this case is not likely to be committed in light of the motive and method of the crime.

On October 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of two years and six months for a special robbery on October 19, 2017, and committed the instant crime in the same manner as the instant crime was committed only one month.

The defendant shall compensate the victim for damage.

arrow