The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

We examine the grounds of appeal.

The court below affirmed the judgment of the first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim for damages on the ground that there is no other evidence to acknowledge the existence of an agreement between the Defendant and B on the scope of use of the instant weather advertisement by means of cable and satellite channels, three aerial waves, three companies, five years old ages, Internet homepage, and F website in 208.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding facts beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.