1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning of this court's reasoning is that the defendant's argument that "the plaintiff renounced the remaining security deposit while receiving part of the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis at the time of sale and purchase of the apartment of this case" is insufficient to recognize the defendant's argument, except for the rejection of the statement of Eul No. 10 (including each number), it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited by applying the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.