logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.09 2018나5669
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 15, 2018, the Plaintiff was newly established in a corporation B, a corporation operating a route bus passenger transportation services, etc. using an E-city (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) by dividing the “city passenger transportation services sector” through a temporary general meeting of shareholders on November 15, 2018. The matters established on January 2, 2019 on the certificate of registration of the corporation were registered, and all rights and obligations related to the bus transportation services were comprehensively transferred by B.

hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff" shall be referred to as "Plaintiff".

The defendant is a person who operates a F driver's vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant's vehicle").

The Intervenor joining the Defendant is an insurance company with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle, for which the comprehensive automobile insurance has been subscribed.

B. On June 8, 2017, the Plaintiff’s driver G was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on and around 15:20, and the Plaintiff’s driver G tried to change the bus line into the two-lane, which is the left left-hand one, the two-lane to the left-hand one, in order to enter the new railway station, from the boundary of the new village to the intersection, among five-lanes near the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City H.

C. At that time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle attempted to change the direction to the right side of the Defendant vehicle, but the Defendant vehicle was proceeding in the future, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle changed to the two lanes following the front of the Defendant vehicle while changing to the two lanes, the left side part of the Defendant vehicle was shocked due to the sudden stop of the Defendant vehicle.

In the police investigation regarding the above traffic accident, the Defendant stated to the effect that “the Plaintiff’s vehicle is not a route for entering the bus at all, thereby setting up the Defendant’s vehicle in a lump sum to make a port on the Defendant’s chest.”

E. The signal system of the two-lane running by the Defendant vehicle at the time of the suspension of the vehicle by the Defendant vehicle is the left turn signal, and all the vehicles running ahead of the Defendant vehicle are in line with that signal.

arrow