logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.04 2018가단28776
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From November 1, 2017, India.

Reasons

On November 1, 2011, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as KRW 1,90,000 (excluding value-added tax) for monthly rent. The Defendant paid only monthly rent until October 31, 2017 after the lease of the said real estate, and thereafter delayed payment of monthly rent may be recognized by taking into account the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties; or (b) evidence No. 1, No. 2, and No. 1, and No. 3 of the evidence No. 3.

According to the above facts, the delivery of the complaint of this case containing the purport of terminating the lease on the ground of the overdue rent for at least two years by the defendant, barring any special circumstance, and the lease between the plaintiff and the defendant has been terminated lawfully. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet leased to the plaintiff and pay the money calculated from November 1, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the above real estate at KRW 2,90,000 per month (including value-added tax) as the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent after the overdue rent and the termination of the lease

The plaintiff's claim is legitimate, and all is accepted.

arrow