Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. In the organization of Bosishing “ Bosishing” by receiving money from another person’s account that belongs to and has been secured in advance as to lending money to an unspecified number of victims of fraud, the Defendant is a “written withdrawal of cash” under the name of the Defendant, under the direction of an employee of Bosishing (C. D) who was sent by the said organization, and received the money from the account linked to the cash card sent by the said organization as a result of the crime of fraud.

The aforementioned Bosing staff plans to commit the so-called “loan fraud” crime by receiving money from the victims by sending money to an unspecified number of victims by misrepresenting them to a financial institution, and the Defendant would take 5% of the face amount of money of the victims from early July 2017, with knowledge that the above staff members acquired the victims’ money through the crime of Bosing, the Defendant would take five% of the face amount of money of the victims from early 2017.

When keeping a body card, etc. sent by the internal bank, it is possible to deposit money with the bank account notified to the internal bank.

“The proposal received and accepted the proposal, and conspired in order to withdraw and deliver the amount of damage suffered by the victims of licensing with the physical cards sent by D, etc.

According to the sharing of the above roles, the members of the singing singing singing singing singing singing singing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing

It is expected to offer a low interest rate substitute loan.

First of all, it is necessary to pay the money to repay the existing loan.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the said staff did not have the intent or ability to provide loans or to repay the existing obligations of the victims even if they received money from the victims.

Nevertheless, the said Bosing staff received KRW 3,000,000 from the victim’s account in the name of G around July 7, 2017, from the victim, by deceiving the victim as above.