logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.05.28 2013고정1467
횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around July 22, 2012, at D located in the window C of Changwon-si around July 2, 2012, provided a picture work to the exhibition, and the Defendant, from around July 23, 2012, the following year,

8. Until December 23, 200, F.C. admission tickets, which were held in the second exhibition room of the above D, are sold through (ju) Ethienian site (hereinafter “Ethy”) and (ju) G. D., and the bonds equivalent to 27% of the sales revenue of admission tickets paid from the above company are transferred.

“The assignment of claims was agreed upon.”

Around August 9, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 14,941,590 from the said State from the said Company and embezzled KRW 51,760,82 from the said Company for the purpose of paying the amount of KRW 13,975,42, as stated in the attached list, as well as paying KRW 14,941,590 from the said Company from the said Company until the said month from August 31, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and E;

1. A contract for service use, joint agreement, F account statement, settlement details, claim transfer and takeover contract for the ticket sales system and marketing service;

1. An investigation report (Report on the amount deposited by a suspect by an agent for the sale of diskettes and the amount equivalent to the interests of a complainant) / 25% of the sales of the admission ticket of the instant exhibition as of July 1, 2012 is prepared by J (the main representative director K, and the contents of the claim transfer/acquisition contract stating that 27% of the sales of the admission ticket of the instant case is transferred to the complainant who is the manager of the forest, but all of the parties to the contract did not affix their signatures and seals until the date of the commencement of the instant exhibition. The existing issues related to the number, quality, and public relations of the pictures established between the Defendant, G, H, E, and L, as of July 22, 2012, which was the day immediately before the date of the instant exhibition, are connected with the shares as above.

arrow