logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.04.17 2018나57560
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except to dismiss or add some of the following, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Judgment of the court of first instance and its determination are justifiable in light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance as evidence Nos. 8 through 14 (including the number of branch numbers) submitted by the plaintiff in this court, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff in the grounds for appeal). The defendant No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the third defendant No. 17 as "the plaintiff."

Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance" with "No. 1 and No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance."

Pursuant to the 6th sentence of the first instance judgment, “B No. 11-14 of the evidence 10” is added to “B 11-23.”

The following are added to the 7th written judgment of the first instance court: (a) the first written judgment of the first instance is either paid or paid.

Since the instant officetels is divided into three stories and nine stories above ground, it seems not easy for the Plaintiff to remove all of the instant officetels in a short period. The Defendants’ planning to purchase Ma and L from K to use it as a dormitory, etc. of the employees of the non-party company is not deemed to have economic value.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed.

arrow