1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal between the plaintiff A and the defendant shall be the representative of the plaintiff A church.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when using the eight to twelve (9) pages of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(C) Since a resolution of dismissal is null and void, the defendant who is the chairman of a party shall be the representative of the plaintiff church and the legitimate convening authority of the joint council.

However, the plaintiff church

5.1.The Joint Council is deemed to have been convened by the Plaintiff B without the authority to convene, and thus the defect is very serious and null and void, the resolution for filing a suit at the above Joint Council shall not have the effect.

In other words, the plaintiff church's lawsuit is unlawful as it is brought by a person who has no power of representation without a legitimate resolution of the joint council without any further review.

A person shall be appointed.

2. As such, the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is brought by a person without the power of representation or as it is unlawful as there is no interest in confirmation.

As the judgment of the court of first instance is justified in conclusion, the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed, and Article 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance (2) of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs, who are represented by the representative of the plaintiff A church, and the costs of lawsuit between plaintiffs B, C, D, E, F, G, and the defendant shall be corrected since it is obvious that the costs of lawsuit between the plaintiff,