logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단4696
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaging in driving a C-WG35S car.

On July 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of 104 km per hour from the dong-gu National Sports Center in the Dong-gu Daejeon-dong on July 24, 2017, and proceeded at a speed of 104 km per hour from the east-gu to the east-dong-dong.

In this case, the driver had a duty of care to reduce the speed prior to entering the intersection and to prevent the accident by driving safely and to ensure that there is another vehicle driving through the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through the intersection at a speed of 104 km a speed exceeding 44 km per hour by negligence in the course of business, which entered the intersection from the right side of the Defendant’s car driving direction to the left side, and the victim D (33 ) who was passing through the intersection from the right side of the Defendant’s car driving direction to the left side, got the left side part of the ECA 100 Katobba, and went beyond the floor of the Defendant’s passenger car driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment from the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the body.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a person who owns CT G35S car.

Although the owner of a motor vehicle is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, the defendant was driving the motor vehicle of the above Y G35S which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each medical certificate and each medical statement;

1. The actual condition survey report, field photographs, traffic accident analysis appraisal report, investigation report ( listening to the statement of the particulars of mandatory insurance coverage on the date of the occurrence of the accident), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Submission of suspect automobile insurance premium receipts, etc.);

arrow