Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 7, 2017, around the Government-Si around 21:38, the Defendants discovered a wall of approximately KRW 20,000,00 of the market price of the victim E, which was located in the Council room for the escape of the “D” clothing store, and subsequently stolen the victim’s property through integration.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. E statements;
1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;
1. Investigation report (the counter-investigation of the staff member of the new card customer center and reply note);
1. Reports on internal investigation (for the victim's counter investigation, and for the vision reading investigation);
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic materials, such as internal photographic materials of a escape cell at the scene of damage, picture picture materials of a scenario (before, after, after, after, during, and after the crime), sales slips (credit card records used by suspects), and photoic materials, such as wallets, which are damaged articles;
1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the said Act for mitigation of a small amount of punishment (the following favorable circumstances):
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(the following favorable circumstances) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of the punishment] mitigated area (one to six months) of the mitigated area (the theft of things, etc. left alone) of the category 1 (the theft of things, etc.) of the general property is not subject to the punishment [the decision of a special mitigated person], and the defendants have a depth of their mistakes.
In agreement with the victim, the injured party does not want to punish the defendants.
There is no record of punishment for the same crime, and there is no record of punishment exceeding a fine so far.
In this context, the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines and other sentencing conditions, such as the defendants' age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence, after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions.