A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:50 on August 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s house B (n, 36 years of age), and (b) expressed the victim’s word at home, the Defendant threatened the victim, carrying with him dangerous objects, i.e., bags for kitchen use (22 cm in total length), which are dangerous objects in the water reservoir at the water reservoir at the water reservoir at the water reservoir at the water reservoir at the water reservoir at the port; and (c) took them under the victim’s neck, and she brought them to the victim’s neck; and (d) “I see where I see,” and “I see, where I see, what I see, what I am.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing criminal implements photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of intimidation to carry dangerous articles);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation]: The execution of sentence shall be suspended only once, taking into account the following factors: (a) the necessity of strict punishment is large in light of the risk of committing a crime (decision of sentence in June to June), (b) the likelihood of causing a crime; (c) the confession is deemed to have occurred; (d) the confessions are made contingent; (e) the victim and the victim have agreed smoothly; and (e) the relationship of past force is to be postponed.

In regard to the facts charged that the Defendant, at the same time and time as indicated in its holding, assaulted the victim by cutting down the right part of the victim by hand, cutting down the victim's right part, and cutting down the boom, this part of the facts charged constitutes a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and thus, the Defendant cannot be prosecuted against the victim's explicit intent pursuant to Article 260 (3)

However, according to the records, the victim B is prosecuted in this case.