A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 6 or 7 shall be confiscated.

1,317,50 won from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant handled Metepha (copon, hereinafter “copon”) which is a local mental medicine as follows.

1. On December 2016, the Defendant received Handphones from D and received approximately 4g Handphones from D in a vehicle parked near Dongjak-gu, Seoul around the lower order of 20:00.

2. On January 10, 2017, the Defendant purchased a penphone from D with approximately KRW 100,000,000 in the vehicle parked near the exit No. 5 p. F. E at the time of luminous, and purchased a penphone with approximately 4g of a penphone from D.

3. Medication of phiphones.

A. On December 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid down a philopon on a philopon in an influorial room near the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dae-gu, by placing it on the gambling place; and (b) administered the philopon in a manner that inhales it by heating the philopon on the philopon and inhales it.

B. On January 9, 2017, around 21:00, the Defendant administered HEL (L) located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, approximately 0.5g of philophones, in the same manner as the above (Ga).

(c)

On January 11, 2017, the Defendant administered approximately 0.5g g opphones within a vehicle (K) parked in the way near J Hospital located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu around January 11, 201.

4. On January 11, 2017, the Defendant, at the “M hotel” shop in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, carrying approximately 0.4g oponon at the back of the Defendant’s stud PC at the “M hotel” shop in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and carrying approximately 0.4g opon on the front side of the Defendant’s stud PC at the first floor parking lot of the said hotel, while the number of opon under the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (K) parked at the 1st floor of the said hotel was written as “2.63g of a opon,” but it is obvious that the number of opon, carried under the front part of the driver’s seat in the indictment, is a clerical error in calculation (see, e.g., a letter of narcotics appraisal on the 197th page).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect for the police of each prosecution regarding D;

1. Each protocol of seizure;