A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:00 on February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) made several calls available in a restaurant with the luminous conference and the 2nd week, and (b) obstructed the victim’s frequency business by force on the ground that the victim made the victim’s speech that “the son was able to have a son’s telephone short,” and “the son was able to have a son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the criminal defendant has repented and reflected his/her wrong offense, and the criminal defendant has

1. The main sentence of Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;