The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment of the lower court against the Defendant (the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program with 8 months and 40 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable (the Defendant explicitly withdrawn the mistake of facts and the assertion of mental or physical disorder on the first trial date of the first trial of the lower trial). 2. On the grounds for appeal, there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as where the Defendant acknowledges all the instant criminal acts, but the fact that the Defendant’s judgment on the grounds for appeal is not easy to feel sexual humiliation or mental shock. However, there are no special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the lower judgment was sentenced, and there is no change in the circumstance that there is no other special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior, method of crime, and the circumstances after the crime, even if examining all the sentencing conditions as

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.