Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Basic Facts] The organization of the phishing crime consisting of the victims of the victims' personal information from call center to an unspecified number of victims while misrepresenting them, and allowing them to withdraw the victims' personal information leaked and to take out the deposits held by them as security, or to keep them in the house by obtaining a loan. The Financial Supervisory Service employees shall find out the victims' home address, apartment entrance password, and the house entrance password, and induce the victims out of the house, using the victims' home address, password, and password, and use the victims' home address and password, and use the victim's home address and password to prevent the victims from committing the phishing crime. After confirming that the collection measures have been properly carried out in the vicinity of the victims' home, the delivery measures are prevented by sharing the amount of damage by collecting and delivering it to the accomplices.
On January 12, 2016, the victims of the above nameless boxes should return to the victim D who works in the house of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1, 506, a house-to-house 1, 506 of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government c apartment house, and “the personal information has been leaked to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, so the bank has withdrawn money or obtained a loan as collateral
The employee of the Financial Supervisory Service conducted a false statement that he/she conducted an investigation at his/her home, stating that he/she should know the family address and password of the first floor, and the house entrance password, etc., and found the victim's home address and password, etc., and then invaded upon the victim's house on three occasions from January 12, 2016 to January 15, 2016, and stolen the victim's deposit withdrawal and loans in cash amounting to KRW 14 million.
[2] The court shall examine the facts charged as stated in the indictment without any amendment to the indictment, to the extent that it does not disadvantage the defendant's defense.