beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. The attached appraisal map No. 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 8, 9, 10, 11 among the 408 square meters in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 29, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) woned a bid of 408 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”); and (b) D 448 square meters (hereinafter “per parcel number”) for each of the said lands, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 20, 2014; and (c) on November 23, 2015, the land D was expropriated on November 23, 2015.
B. The instant land, D land, E, and F land consisting of four plastic houses, two household buildings, and two household buildings on the ground of the instant land. Korea accepted obstacles on D land, E land, and F land, and deposited the land expropriation compensation with the Defendant as a depositee on November 18, 2015.
C. Of the instant land, one of the vinyls as indicated in the instant Paragraph (b) has been located in the part of 382 square meters, which connects the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 1 to 382 square meters (hereinafter “instant occupied part”), among the instant land. The rent from October 29, 2014 to October 28, 2015, from October 29, 2015, is KRW 2,967,389, from October 29, 2015 to June 27, 2016.
[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap's evidence 1, Gap's evidence 5 through 7, Gap's evidence 10, Gap's evidence 11 (including additional numbers), the result of each commission of appraisal to the Korea Land Information Corporation, the President of Sungnam branch of the Korea Land Information Corporation, Eul's whole purport of pleading
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, in light of the fact that a vinyl exists on the ground of the occupied part of this case, and the above vinyl was adjudicated to expropriate in the name of the defendant, the defendant is judged to possess the occupied part of this case by installing a vinyl on the ground of the occupied part of this case. The defendant occupied the occupied part of this case, thereby hindering the plaintiff's exercise of ownership by occupying the occupied part of this case, thereby hindering the owner of this case's exercise of ownership, thereby gaining profits equivalent to the rent of the occupied part of this case, and causing the plaintiff to suffer damages equivalent to the same amount.
As to this, the defendant on 204.