logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.05 2015고정1798
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2015, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of “C” taxi, was driving the said taxi on April 21, 2015, and was directly engaged in business negligence in violation of yellow signal at the intersection where the front signal, etc. of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is installed, and received the front right side of the “F” vehicle of the “F” vehicle, which is surrounded by the center line on the opposite opposite lane, in front of the Defendant’s taxi left side.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim G, who is a taxi passenger of the Defendant due to the foregoing occupational negligence, to put about two weeks of medical treatment to the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of the traffic accident report, traffic accident occurrence report, diagnostic certificate, the site and vehicle photographs, and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black stay images;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act.

1. Sentencing penalties of KRW 700,000 (former summary – KRW 500,00 won; KRW 500,000,000: KRW 1 million; KRW 1 million; KRW 2.0 million; KRW 1 million; KRW 1 million; KRW 2.00: (3) there are no specific grounds other than a confession, ② no specific grounds other than a fine; and (4) other unfavorable grounds for sentencing, such as the victim’s age, family relationship, and economic aspects, etc.: 5) strict countermeasures against traffic accidents in order to establish a safe traffic order in which Korean citizens can drive, 6) the defendant’s occupation.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow