Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is under medical care at C the Medical Care Center for the Aged, and is a club with the victim D.

On March 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00 on March 15, 2014, at the Defendant’s sick room of the second floor E, the second floor of the C Older Persons’s Medical Care Center located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant was her husband F, and the victim was her husband was her husband, and the victim was her husband was her husband’s contact with her husband. As a result, the Defendant was at the time when

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is intending to go to the victim, was “B,” and got off the bags cited by the victim while “B”.

In order for the victim to take off his bank, the defective defendant did not take the bank so that he did not take the bank, carried his hand, and caused the victim to suffer the elbling and closing of the 4th son's bones, which requires treatment for about six weeks, which is the left side of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 262, 260 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Violence in the crime of assault on the ground of conviction under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, that is, assault in consultation refers to the exercise of tangible force on the body of a person, and the act of putting the hand clothes also has the risk of causing injury;

It is a assault if it is of a nature that may cause physical physiological pain or displeasure.

However, even if the defendant did not pluck up or pluck up the victim's fingers in the course of taking a bank, the act of cutting off the bank by detention even though he gets off against the victim's resistance which would not go up to the base is against the victim's hand.