1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 20, 2003, the Plaintiff is a worker who had been employed in the assembly work division as a member of the so-called “instant factory” (hereinafter referred to as “instant factory”).

B. On August 10, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) visited the hospital due to the occurrence of pains in the process of putting and moving a criminal spread during night work at the instant plant; (b) received the diagnosis of “porizontal escape certificate No. 3-4; (c) a conical signboard escape certificate No. 4-5, a conical signboard escape certificate No. 4-5; and (d) a conical signboard escape certificate No. 5-3,000 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury and disease”); and (b) applied for the first medical care benefit to the Defendant on November 3, 2015.

C. On August 11, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval for medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s medical records related to the instant medical science, including MRI, is not clearly identified, and that the overall withdrawal of the disease is observed, and that the Plaintiff’s performance of work at a variety of self-conscepts is not recognized as related to the instant medical branch’s work.

On April 18, 2016, the plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.

[Ground of recognition] No dispute, Gap 3, 5, Eul 1 and 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant injury and disease occurred due to cumulative occupational burden on title and Heari by, for example, engaging in the assembly of vehicles with approximately 360 to 400 vehicles per day for about 15 years since the Plaintiff joined the instant factory. As such, even if proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work and the injury and disease was recognized, the Defendant’s disposition of this case should be revoked illegally.

B. The disease that is occupational accident under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is determined.