beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From March 19, 2012, the relevant Plaintiff was hospitalized in the same hospital as cerebrovascular surgery on September 8, 2012, and was hospitalized in the same hospital as cerebrovascular surgery due to dementia and stimulative disorder, and received an operational treatment of both astronomical astronomical typhical and dysical typology.
The special representative is the mother of the plaintiff's wife and the defendant's assistant intervenor, and the defendant's assistant intervenor is the son of the plaintiff and the special representative, and D is the wife of the defendant joining the defendant.
B. 1) On May 11, 2011, the Defendant loaned KRW 12,00,000,000 to the Intervenor joining the Defendant, and the Defendant set up a pledge on the same day’s deposit account (number E, deposit amount of KRW 2,50,000,000) in the Plaintiff’s deposit account (number E, deposit amount of KRW 2,500,000) established by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant pledge 1”).
(2) The deposit was terminated upon the maturity of May 11, 2012, and the principal amounting to KRW 2,500,000,000 was deposited in the Plaintiff’s fixed deposit account (number: F) opened in the Defendant, and the interest amounting to KRW 92,194,170 was transferred to the Plaintiff’s other accounts.
On July 2, 2014, the Defendant issued a pledge against the Plaintiff’s temporary guardian G and the Intervenor’s Intervenor (“Account Number”)’s principal amounting to KRW 2,500,000,000, interest amounting to KRW 111,216,562, and notified the Defendant that the said amount was offset by the principal amounting to KRW 2,542,540,540,835, interest rateing to KRW 68,675,727, as of May 11, 2011.
C. On March 29, 2010, the Defendant loaned KRW 15,000,000 to the Defendant’s Intervenor for the Intervenor for the Intervenor’s Intervenor for the creation and enforcement of a pledge right as to KRW 19,50,000 on the Plaintiff’s “Land Development 337T14” claim against the Korea Land and Housing Corporation. On July 22, 2010, the Defendant loaned KRW 3,80,000,000 to the Defendant’s Intervenor for the corporate working loan to secure this.