The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Most of the plaintiffs (part of the plaintiffs were employed after the establishment of the defendant company, and they are referred to as "the plaintiffs") belong to 11 cooperation companies of the former Co., Ltd. C (hereinafter "Co., Ltd.") such as B (hereinafter "Co., Ltd.") such as the former Co., Ltd.) (hereinafter "Co., Ltd.") and are currently employed or retired by entering the defendant company in accordance with the "social Agreement" (hereinafter "social Agreement of this case") as seen below while serving as bread articles or carpets.

2) A is a corporation, the business purpose of which is to engage in bread production and sales, etc., and which is a personal entrepreneur (hereinafter “franchises”) by entering into a franchise agreement with a franchise agreement, and runs a franchise business in the name of “D”. The Defendant Company is a subsidiary of the Company, established on October 27, 2017 (the mission at the time of its establishment is the E Company) by a company specializing in hiring, educating, training, and quality control of the materials working in the D franchise store, and of production skills of bread, brea, sand site, and beverage production skills.

B. Existing C and franchise business operators’ relationship 1) C entered into a business agreement with the instant collaborative entity, including the following: “The collaborative entity shall provide franchisees with labor services for bread and carpets to which the collaborative entity belongs so that franchisees can smoothly engage in product production activities.”

2) A franchisee entered into a contract with the instant collaborative entity to provide the instant collaborative entity with the services of bread and Kabatoer and pay the price for the services to the said collaborative entity. A franchisee was provided by the collaborative entity with the services of the bread and Kabatoer, and operated a franchise store with the subcontractor. The Plaintiffs entered into an employment contract with the said collaborative entity.