logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.08 2014가단118353
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the annexed real estate list;

B. From May 15, 2014, the above A.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 13, 2009, the lessor Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd., the lessee B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”), and the truster Plaintiff concluded the following lease contracts.

1) Lease object: Real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”)

(2) Lease term of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 101, 102 apartment units, 52 apartment units, 13 households of officetels 2): Lease deposit from May 13, 2009 to May 12, 2012: 500,000 to 4) Monthly Rent: 48,000,000 residential apartment units (not value-added tax), 13 households of office officetels 10,000 (excluding value-added tax)

B. On December 23, 2011, the Plaintiff acquired the registration of ownership transfer from the Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. for the instant real estate, and entered into a lease agreement with B on May 11, 2012, with the following content.

1) Lease object: Lease deposit between May 13, 2012 and May 12, 2014: 1,500,000,000 won for an apartment unit of KRW 35,00,000 for an apartment unit of KRW 51 households (excluding value-added tax), officetels 15,00,000 for an officetel (excluding value-added tax)

C. On July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff amended the terms and conditions of the said lease agreement with B as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as "lease Agreement of this case") . (1) Lease period: 2) Lease deposit from May 14, 2014 to the beginning date of the lease term under the first lease contract: 900,000,000 won (term payment)

D. In March 2014, the Plaintiff agreed with the following contents.

1) B waives the claim for return of the lease deposit under the above lease agreement. (2) The Plaintiff is to perform instead of the obligation for the sub-lease deposit to be borne by B under the sub-lease agreement entered into by B with respect to the goods subject to the above lease agreement. (3) As above, the Plaintiff’s repayment of the sub-lease deposit to the sub-lessee is a dispute between the parties.

arrow