Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 201, from around 23:20 to 23:30, Defendants shared, on the ground that the victim E (35 years of age) who resides in the same apartment that had a 402-dong 402-dong 403-dong Yansan-si and 403-dong Yansan-si drinking alcohol, and that the victim E (35 years of age) went through drinking alcohol to the above apartment group, and the female-friendly dong flasing group, the victim's flasing flascing flascing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing scing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the punishment of crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant A and the defendant under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged that the above defendant did not assault the victim's fat, although he did not contain any fact that he did not assault the victim's fat. However, the victim consistently stated the above defendant's 2-3 times at this court and investigation agency about the defendant's drinking fat at this court and investigation agency, and there is no circumstance to suspect that the victim's above statement was false. Thus, in light of each evidence of the judgment, including the victim's above statement, the defendant A and the defense counsel can sufficiently recognize the fact that the above defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning jointly with the defendant B

The defendants of the reasons for sentencing are both physically disabled persons, the degree of assault in the case of defendant A is not severe, and in the case of defendant B, they have agreed with the victim.