logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단809
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Defendant as to items 2, 8 through 11, 18, 19, 39 through 44 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person of the 2018 Highest 809 shall lend or lend any access medium with a demand or promise to receive compensation.

On October 13, 2017, the Defendant heard 2.5 million won from the name in the cartoon camera located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon to lend his account from the name in the cartoon camera, and her physical card connected with the Defendant’s name in the name of Kwikset Service.

Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on January 14, 2016, and was released on December 23, 2016 in the Incheon Detention House on December 14, 2016 and the parole period expired on April 10, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime, around March 2018, purchased a fake precious metal sold at the Internet main market of the second and second countries, and concluded that they will provide the said fake metal as collateral and acquire money under the name of the loan by deceiving it as if it was a fake metal.

Defendant

B around April 5, 2018, Defendant A was loaded into a car and arrived before the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Southern-gu G Center Center of F2 stories, Defendant A was waiting in the said car, Defendant B was waiting in the said pawn-type, Defendant B entered the said pawn-type, and Defendant H of the victim H, the owner of the business, “A is urgently required to carry out a handphone funeral.”

‘Falsely speaking, 18k gold (10 d. 6% d. d. d. d. d. 10 d. d.) provided as security and requested loans.

However, in fact, since the above 18k gold metal was made a fake metal, there was no value as a collateral, and even if the loan was made, there was no intention or ability to repay the principle at the time of the promise.

Nevertheless, Defendant B is paid one million won as a loan from the injured party by deceiving the injured party as such.

arrow