logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2011.08.24 2010고단1012
근로기준법위반
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of D in the Gunsan-si C, who is a full-time 19 employee and operates the manufacturing industry.

The Defendant did not pay KRW 25,631,451 in total for eight overdue wages, as stated in the “Attachment 1’s Schedule of Overdue Wages”, including KRW 2,621,490, which retired from office while working in the above D from December 2, 2009 to March 4, 2010, within 14 days from the date of occurrence of the payment cause without an agreement on extension of the payment date between the parties concerned.

"2011 Highest 123"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Labor Standards Act is the representative of G and D in the Si of Gunsan, a company located in the F in the Si of Gunsan, who has employed 50 full-time workers and operated the manufacturing business.

The Defendant worked in the foregoing D from December 3, 2009 to February 28, 2010, and did not pay 38,361,500 won in total for 18 overdue wages as stated in the attached Table 2, including 3,466,00 won for retired workers I’s overdue wages, within 14 days from the date of occurrence of the payment cause without an agreement on extension of the due date between the parties concerned.

2. Fraud;

A. On May 24, 2010, the Defendant against the victim J tolded that the victim J (the age of 46) who operates a cafeteria at the construction site of L Co., Ltd. located in K in Gunsan-si, and that “if the Defendant provides meals to employees belonging to our company’s site, the price will be paid at the end of each month.”

However, at that time, the overdue wages reach 410,05,785 won (78,782,212 won 331,273,573 won), and the bank debt reaches 4-500 million won, and even if the total amount of the credit is not recovered or recovered, even if the amount of the credit exceeds the amount of the credit, there was no intention and ability to pay the amount at the end of each month even if the credit is provided by the victim.

As above, the Defendant, from May 24, 2010 to August 6, 2010, served 12,084,600 won for 30 employees.

arrow