logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.07.25 2014고정375
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 high-level 375] On November 27, 2013, the Defendant driven a C cab and proceeded with the “Korea Hospital” as a shooting range of “Seoul Hospital” on the part of the two-lane road, which is linked to Jeju city, depending on the two-lane road, on November 27, 2013. At the request of the passengers, the Defendant got left to the left at the “Seoul Sea Tourist Hospital.” Since there is a crosswalk installed a front door, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting his duty of care to reduce the speed and to ensure safe operation of the said crosswalk, and thereby, the victim D (n, 34 years old), which was the victim of the said crosswalk, caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as d(n, e.g., d., having to give treatment for about two weeks in front of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

[20] Around 04:56 December 2, 2012, the Defendant was driving a C cab to proceed with a shooting distance in front of the “movable station” which is linked to Jeju city, from the New Jeju Elementary School. At the time, the Defendant had a red flickering signal on the signal apparatus at the intersection of the vehicle at the time, so, the Defendant was under the duty of care to temporarily stop prior to the crossing and proceed with the traffic of other vehicles, and due to the negligence of the victim E (n, 41 years old) (n, 41 years old) driving the said intersection and the front left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, thereby resulting in the collision between the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle and the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s left side, and the Defendant’s injury to the passenger seat and the front part of the passenger seat, etc. requiring treatment of each of the two weeks in the direction of the vehicle at the time, and thus, the Defendant was under the duty of care to temporarily stop the said intersection before the intersection.

Summary of Evidence

[Attachment 2014 fixed375]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.Each.

arrow