1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff A is the deceased F (hereinafter “the deceased”).

Plaintiff B, C, and D are the deceased’s children. 2) The Defendant is a legal entity operating G Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On April 11, 2015, the Deceased of the instant accident occurred with a bicycle riding without wearing a fitness, and at around 11:32 on April 11, 2015, the accident occurred, which occurred in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital. The Deceased arrived at the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital on the same day on the same day.

C. 1) The medical personnel of the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “the first CT photograph”) around 12:32 April 11, 2015, when the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital took brain CT photograph against the Deceased (hereinafter “the first CT photograph”).

As a result, there was an opinion to cut down the blood transfusion (acute submeral) and two thrings. 2) around April 11, 2015, the deceased’s consciousness was deteriorated, and around 17:07 on the same day, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital carried out brain CT shooting (hereinafter “second CT shooting”) against the deceased, and as a result, the two thrings of the right side side of the right side was remarkably increased compared to the result of the first cerebrT shooting, and accordingly, the brain was moved to the left side of the right side, and accordingly, the occurrence of the blood transfusion was considerably increased.

3) On April 11, 2015, around 18:10, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed sacratic saculatory surgery against the Deceased. While the surgery was terminated on the same day on around 22:45, the Deceased was killed on April 18, 2015 when he/she received medical treatment in the patient room at the Defendant Hospital because he/she did not have any consciousness and condition, and died on around 05:54 on April 18, 2015. (In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. From April 11, 2015, after the first CT shooting of the deceased, the deceased’s guardian demanded medical treatment at the emergency room of the Defendant hospital, but the deceased left alone without medical treatment.

The patient's consciousness is the case of an acutely dead-end patient.