A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a Bbee cruise car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).

On February 10, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of liquor around 21:00, driven the said car and proceeded three lanes in front of the Cheongnam Middle School, which was in the 5th place of the Cheongnam-gu Incheon, which was a gambling of the city in Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, with about 30 km in the direction of the apartment in the direction of the king park.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to properly operate the brakes by properly operating the brakes while living well in the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the front-time city and brakes in the front-round bank by neglecting it, and caused the victim C(53 ) who stops into the signal signal signal signal at the front bank, which was driven by the victim C(53 ). The latter part of the motor vehicle back in the front-round vehicle of the Vietnam-do cruise cruise.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while driving the said bed with difficult driving due to the influence of drinking, suffered from the injury of the victim E (the 19 years old) who was on board the said high-speed car in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, such as light fat, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On February 10, 2017, the Defendant was drunkly driving a bee cruise car as described in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the F Office of the Incheon Yeonsu-gu Police Station around February 21, 2017, in a state of alcohol, such as drinking in the Defendant’s entrance from G from the background G belonging to the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Police Station, and giving a warning at the reduction of drinking.

There are reasonable grounds to determine a seal, and from 21:35 to 22:10 on the same day, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the whole influence of a drinking measuring instrument four times.

Nevertheless, the defendant has avoided it and without any justifiable reason.