The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who drives Kwikset on his own.

On December 10, 2019, the Defendant driven the crosswalk 228, Seowon-gu, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and proceeded with the red signal of pedestrians from the B bank to the C bank from the B bank.

At the time, it shall be prohibited from crossing the road by driving a motor vehicle or horse in the event that it is likely to impede the normal passage of pedestrians or other vehicles at night, and the driver of all vehicles shall not cross the road by driving the motor vehicle or horse.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to cross a crosswalk to pedestrian red signal, and the Defendant, at the same time as the head of the Gu, was facing the front kwikset in front of the right side of the vehicle volume for business use in the Estststst (ma, 62 years old) owned by the Eststunkwikset, which is in front of the two-lanes in accordance with the new head of the Gu-U.S. S. S. S.,

Therefore, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle E repair cost of KRW 2,282,269 due to the above occupational negligence.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since a traffic accident agreement clearly stating the victim’s expression of intent not to punish the defendant on January 6, 2020 after the institution of the prosecution was submitted, the prosecution is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.