beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.
except that from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants were hospitalized at a hospital due to an injury or disease without the need of hospitalization, such as knee, knee-hnee-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hum
1. On January 18, 2008, from around 31, 2008 to 31 of the same month, Defendant A was hospitalized at the Bapo-si Medical Center in Ypo-si A with a certificate of hospitalization for 14 days due to the degradation of sampling function, and was issued with a certificate of hospitalization. On February 1, 2008, Defendant A submitted the above certificate of hospitalization to the employee in charge of the name in charge of the victim Hanpo-si Life Co., Ltd. and claimed insurance money.
However, in fact, the defendant's above disease did not require hospital treatment, and the patient's disease could receive hospital treatment, and the defendant's substance of hospital treatment constituted hospital treatment, not hospital treatment, in whole or in part.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim company as above and transferred KRW 960,00 from the victim company to the post office account (E) in the name of the defendant around February 1, 2008. From that time until February 5, 2014, the defendant received the total amount of KRW 126,532,734 from the victims by false or excessive admission into the post office account in the name of the defendant.
2. Defendant B from January 21, 2008 to the same year
2. Until June 2, 2008, a hospitalization certificate was issued for 17 days with a certificate of escape from the G (G (L) G (G) G (F) G (F) G (hereinafter “W), and then filed a claim for the insurance money with the employee in charge of the name and incompactability of the victim Hanpo Life Co., Ltd. on February 11, 2008.
However, in fact, the defendant's above disease did not require hospital treatment, and the patient's disease could receive hospital treatment, and the defendant's substance of hospital treatment constituted hospital treatment, not hospital treatment, in whole or in part.
Nevertheless, it is not possible.