logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.25 2019가단5292845
용역비
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

A. Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant C”) planned to construct a new building in the petition area F at the Cheongju-si, to attract film theaters (hereinafter “instant film theater”) inside the building.

A: Defendant D and B: Plaintiff B

1. Motion picture theaters planned to carry out the work for which the object is heard F;

4. Once a contract for the sale of goods with a third party that he/she mediates is concluded, A shall pay A fees to B as follows:

Fees shall be 2% of the total amount of sales (mast and retail shops).

Provided, That where the purchase price is at least one hundred billion won, an excess amount shall be 1.5%, and where the total amount is at least one hundred billion won, an excess amount shall be applied by 1%.

Provided, That the introduction fee of B shall be the responsibility of B within the fee of the above B.

B. After entering into a trade contract under the above paragraph (a), A shall pay 40% of the agreed fee to B in cash.

(c) Upon paying the balance of the purchase price, A shall pay B in cash 60% of the agreed fee.

(e) omitted;

The payment method of KRW 30,00,000 shall be paid at the time of concluding a lease contract with a third party who has arranged for Eul, and the payment shall be made in accordance with the above (b) and (c).

(f) In the event that Party A’s motion picture theater is directly invested and operated, Party A is ordered to place an order for film museum interior work to Party B.

Provided, That where the interior design is not ordered due to the circumstances of Gap, the interior design cost shall be separately paid as follows.

(Design Cost: The actual average number of movie theaters x 50,000). (b)

On January 20, 2015, Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) who had been in charge of the sales of the film hall of this case entered into an agreement on film board (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with Plaintiff B on the film board to request the brokerage of sale and lease of the film hall.

The main contents are as follows:

C. Defendant C sells the film theater to G Co., Ltd. on March 2, 2016, and on December 5, 2017.

arrow