beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around February 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened an account in the name of a legal entity from a bank “one book,” which is a book for soliciting passbooks; (b) opened an access medium connected to the account and consented to the purport of KRW 100,000,000 for the opening of the account; and (c) applied for the opening of the account at the point of Han-gu, Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 4A, 1 around February 23, 2017, at the 2017, the Defendant applied for the opening of the account at the point of Han-gu, Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, 4A; and (d) the Defendant Company was formally established to create the so-called so-called so-called so-called one-called one-called one-called one-off one-way one-way one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one-party one (hereinafter the above corporation’s representative).
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the establishment of an account in collusion with B, etc. of the victimized bank by fraudulent means.
In addition, from around that time to March 27, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the opening of the accounts of the victimized banks 18 times in total, as shown in the List of Offenses (1) by the aforesaid means.
2. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (hereinafter “Electronic Financial Transactions Act”) included two deposit accounts in the name of “C,” a bank opened as shown in the foregoing paragraph 1 in the vicinity of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangnam-gu Office, Gangnam-gu Office, and (hereinafter “C,” a passbook, physical card, etc. connected to two bank accounts in the name of a nominal corporate bank (hereinafter “C, etc.”).
Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to the defendant.
In addition, the Defendant’s above method from around that time to March 27, 2017.