The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect the mistake, the damage has not yet been restored to the present time even though the amount of deception was a large amount of 300 million won, and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim, in light of the circumstances before and after the crime, the fact that there is no change of circumstances that could mitigate the punishment of the court below in the trial at the present instance, and that there is no change of circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that there is no change of circumstances that the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the fact that there are many records and changes in the sentencing theory, the court below's punishment is judged to be appropriate, and it is not unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.