logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.09 2016고단2011
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 2011"

1. A thief: (a) on May 30, 2016, the Defendant: (b) committed theft by carrying 100,000 won of the total market value of the 100,000 won in and out of the Fpoter truck, on the part of the victim D, located in the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D, which is located in the victim D, and on the part of the E-cafeteria located in the victim D, and on the part of the above restaurant.

2. Violation of traffic Acts on roads, and violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On May 29, 2016, the Defendant driven the above truck under the influence of alcohol of about 0.251% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gun G, Ulsan-gun to about 2.3km in the 2-lane 13rd Do of the same Eup-do from the front of the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, to the 13rd Do in the 2nd Dom of the same Eup-do.

B. On June 5, 2016, at around 19:40, the Defendant driven the said truck under the influence of alcohol level of 0.189%, without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the said Defendant’s house to the fourth-lane road of the same Eup/Myeon, from around 2km of the same Eup/Myeon.

(c)

On June 9, 2016, at around 20:30, the Defendant driven H 110 occin with alcohol level 0.108% under the influence of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a bicycle license from the front of the Defendant’s house to the front road of the same Eup-Madong Park in the same Eup-do.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance provided for in the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant No. 20

In the time, at the port, there was no mandatory insurance policy, and it was operated.

On July 22, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the Ulsan District Court on July 22, 2015 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (divated driving), and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act as stated in the foregoing paragraph (2).

arrow