Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a low-income vehicle in B.

On June 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car volume on June 1, 2020, and completed the car car at D stations located in Gwangju City using automatic washing machines at D stations located in Gwangju City, and transferred it bypass to the exit exit.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the vehicle, while the person engaged in the vehicle driving duty is carrying out the vehicle by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and set up the E-learning car volume on the left side of the front direction, set up the E-learning car volume on the third left side of the front direction, made the victim F (the age of 61) who was cleaning inside the front side of the driver's seat to take over the front part of the car volume, and imposed the car volume on the franchise.

Ultimately, around June 1, 2020, the Defendant caused the victim to die in a H hospital located in Gwangju-si on June 1, 202 by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some of the defendant's protocol of interrogation of the police;

1. A traffic accident investigation report, an accident scene map, a traffic accident scene map, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, an accident site photograph, a notification of 112 report, a fluor photograph of the damaged vehicle fluor photograph, a CCTV image-fluor photograph in a gas station, a photograph of the CCTV image-fluoring room in the Sejong Deputy Office, a vehicle boxbox and a gas station, a vehicle fluor image and a gas station, a death diagnosis report (EDR analysis results), an EDR analysis, and an EDR analysis report [the defendant and the defense counsel, and the accident of this case are Bchier car (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”).

Since the accident occurred due to the sudden acceleration of the defendant, the defendant asserts to the effect that he is not guilty due to the lack of occupational negligence.

However, according to the results of the EDR analysis, the results are as follows.